Test case for IMAGINARY and complex numbers from cell references

[Eike Rathke <erack@sun.com>]

Hi,

Seems I forgot to actually transfer this to our list.

I propose to remove those two test cases from IMABS and IMAGINARY, they
seem to be the only places where a complex number is obtained through
a cell reference.

Other opinions?

  Eike

----- Forwarded message from Eike Rathke <erack@sun.com> -----

Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 18:37:50 +0100
Subject: Re: [office-comment] [formula] comments on
From: Eike Rathke <erack@sun.com>
To: office-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
Message-id: <20070115173750.GS63229@sr1-eham02-03.Germany.Sun.COM>

Hi Brad,

On Saturday, 2007-01-13 15:15:20 +1100, Brad Hards wrote:

> In openformula-20061222, Section 6.7.3 deals with the IMAGINARY() function. 
> The second test case appears to be a duplicate from IMABS, which is the 
> previous function in the specification.

Thanks for spotting.

> If there is meant to be a test which makes IMAGINARY() work on a cell 
> reference, then a complex number would probably need to be added to section 
> 2.4.

True. I'll forward to the SC list for discussion.

  Eike

[...]

----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
Automatic string conversions considered dangerous. They are the GOTO statements
of spreadsheets.  --Robert Weir on the OpenDocument formula subcommittee's list.