[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: 1.3 Namespace: compatible extensions?
Greetings! Under 1.3 Namespace we say: > Implementations may also accept formula syntaxes other than > OpenFormula, and they may accept various compatible extensions to the > default OpenFormula syntax. How would we judge a compatible extension? Or was it meant to say: "...they may accept extensions to the default OpenFormula syntax." ? That would parallel the first part of the sentence. I assume like OpenDocument, where OpenFormula provides a function that should be used in preference to an extension. That is to say that extensions are for going beyond OpenFormula and not replacing it. Hope everyone is having a great day! Patrick -- Patrick Durusau firstname.lastname@example.org Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34 Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps) Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300 Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)