6.3.8 Infix Ordered Comparisons

[Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net>]

Greetings!

The list of ordered comparison operators in 6.3.8 is different from 
those in table one (associativity). I assume that is because for = and 
<> that order don't matter.

However, it does seem odd that in both cases that sets of operators are 
defined together. I realize that they share such commonalities that it 
looks easier to simply list them that way but in fact don't < and <= 
have the potential to return different answers in some cases?

That being the case, I think they will need to be broken out into 
separate listings.

Hope everyone is having a great day!

Patrick

-- 
Patrick Durusau
patrick@durusau.net
Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34
Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps)
Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300
Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)