[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Chapter 4 Types
Greetings! It seems to me that to have clear semantic requirements for expressions, operators and functions that we need to start with really clear definitions of types. More as a note to myself that Chapter 4 needs to start with an introduction subsection. That is so it is possible to refer to the text that now immediately follows "4 Types" without appearing to refer to the entire chapter. Second, I think a much shorter, say a paragraph at most, discussion of what lies within this chapter is more than sufficient. As written it defines (or appears to define) rules for values, references, etc. All of that can be done but needs to be done where appropriate. I think part of my uncertainty is that most of this has been defined before. The W3C Schema datatypes come to mind. (http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/) Or, ISO/IEC 11404:1996 (http://std.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC22/WG11/docs/iso11404.pdf) (I am sure there are others, those just happen to be two that come to mind.) Granted there may be some datatypes that are not defined elsewhere that we need but shouldn't we limit ourselves to defining only those? Broader question: What impact would applying the datatypes as defined in ISO/IEC 11404:1996 have on the current function definitions? Are our current definitions far enough from those to cause problems? Hope everyone is having a great day! Patrick -- Patrick Durusau patrick@durusau.net Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34 Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps) Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300 Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]