Re: [office-formula] EOMONTH Function Test Cases (Section 6.9.8)

[Eike Rathke <erack@sun.com>]

Hi Robert,

On Saturday, 2009-02-21 20:19:07 -0500, Robert Weir wrote:

> Eric Patterson <ericpa@exchange.microsoft.com> wrote on 02/13/2009 
> 07:55:48 PM:
> > There seems to be a few typos in the EOMONTH Function test cases. 
> > Specifically:
> > 
> > I believe the expression: =EOMONTH("2000-04-30";-2)=DATE(2006;2;29)
> > should be: =EOMONTH("2000-04-30";-2)=DATE(2000;2;29)
> > 
> > Also, the expression: =EOMONTH("2006-01-05";5)=DATE(2002;6;30
> > should be: =EOMONTH("2006-01-05";5)=DATE(2006;6;30)   <-----Note 
> > missing right Paren as well.
> > 
> > Can someone confirm?
> 
> That looks right to me.

Yes, fine.

> David & Eike, who has the "editing pen" for the draft right now?  Is it 
> Patrick?  I'm not sure Patrick monitors this SC mailing list, however...

I think he does. However, I'll have to clarify with him whether he's
already in the editing process, and if so to give me an "editing window"
in between for next week. My list is growing ...

> So Eric, it might be best to either cc Patrick on any typos you find like 
> this or post them directly to the main TC list.

IMHO we should not clutter the main TC list with such formula details.

  Eike

-- 
Automatic string conversions considered dangerous. They are the GOTO statements
of spreadsheets.  --Robert Weir on the OpenDocument formula subcommittee's list.

PGP signature