[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

*Subject*: **Re: [office-formula] Calculation Settings**

*From*:**"David A. Wheeler" <dwheeler@dwheeler.com>***To*: "Andreas J. Guelzow" <aguelzow@math.concordia.ab.ca>, office-formula@lists.oasis-open.org*Date*: Sat, 16 May 2009 23:22:26 -0400

Andreas J. Guelzow wrote: > I think what one really should want is a specification of the serial > number matching 1904-1-1 and a statement how days and changes in serial > numbers are related. Oh, *now* I see what you mean. Sometimes it takes being hit over the head with a 2x4 :-). Thanks for persevering. That's a good plan. Would you mind proposing the specific changed text, since you noticed this? Robert Weir wants to describe the whole thing as a separate type, but it'd clearly be easier to simply make this clarification instead. And even if eventually we described it as a separate type (which I'm not sure we really should do since ISNUMBER() etc. reveal they're really numbers), we would STILL want this clarification. --- David A. Wheeler

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: [office-formula] Calculation Settings***From:*Andreas J Guelzow <aguelzow@math.concordia.ab.ca>

**References**:**[office-formula] Calculation Settings***From:*Eric Patterson <ericpa@exchange.microsoft.com>

**Re: [office-formula] Calculation Settings***From:*"David A. Wheeler" <dwheeler@dwheeler.com>

**RE: [office-formula] Calculation Settings***From:*Eric Patterson <ericpa@exchange.microsoft.com>

**RE: [office-formula] Calculation Settings***From:*"Andreas J. Guelzow" <aguelzow@math.concordia.ab.ca>

**Re: [office-formula] Calculation Settings***From:*"David A. Wheeler" <dwheeler@dwheeler.com>

**Re: [office-formula] Calculation Settings***From:*"Andreas J. Guelzow" <aguelzow@math.concordia.ab.ca>

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]