Re: [office-formula] Implementation-defined, Unspecified, and Undefinedbehaviorsin OpenFormula

[robert_weir@us.ibm.com]

Yes, when I get back from the Hague plugfest I plan on taking an editorial 
pass at the draft, making good on a promise I made long ago when I 
volunteered to be co-editor of OpenFormula.

-Rob

"David A. Wheeler" <dwheeler@dwheeler.com> wrote on 06/12/2009 09:04:57 
AM:
> 
> Date:
> 
> 06/12/2009 09:09 AM
> 
> Subject:
> 
> Re: [office-formula] Implementation-defined, Unspecified, and 
> Undefined
 behaviors in OpenFormula
> 
> robert_weir@us.ibm.com wrote:
> > The language on precision is:
> > 
> > "This specification does not, by itself, specify a numerical 
> > implementation model,....
> > I think I would call this "implementation-defined" and we probably 
want to 
> > say that explicitly in cases like this.
> 
> Okay, that's a good idea.
> 
> Can I talk you into proposing some alternative text?
> 
> --- David A. Wheeler
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 
>