Re: [office-formula] Proposal for regularly scheduled meetings

[Kohei Yoshida <kyoshida@novell.com>]

On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 21:18 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
> Hi Robert,
> 
> On Wednesday, 2009-07-22 09:48:52 -0400, Robert Weir wrote:
> 
> > But I do agree with Andreas that a call is not really necessary if we can 
> > make more disciplined use of the list.  The call itself is not as 
> > important as the preparation and the follow-up that we do based on items 
> > discussed on the call.  But we could just as well do that on the list.
> 
> Sure, we could, and we did so in the past. Hopefully one call will be
> enough to boot us up again ;-)  If we now agree that we won't need
> a call I'm fine with that as well, but we have to keep things going.
> 
> I'd also like to know who effectively will be on board of this
> subcommitte. It seems to me some of the original members (not the very
> early "task force" anyway) didn't show up anymore since ages.
> 
> People I remember having seen in the last, let's say, 6-12 months or so:
> 
> David Wheeler
> Robert Weir
> Andreas Guelzow
> Kohei Yoshida
> Eric Patterson
> Doug Mahugh
> David Faure
> Eike Rathke
> 
> Sorry if I omitted anyone. Who can we count on for the remaining work,
> and be it for insightful discussion of issues in time? I'm placing
> a * near my name..

I'm still here, though I haven't been able to keep up with all that's
going on lately.  But I would like to continue being involved in some
way.... probably some discussions here and there and small contributions
here and there... that sort of stuff.

Kohei