[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [office-formula] OFFICE-2164: EASTERSUNDAY
That would work just fine. I'm happy to see that is already there. The Java naming convention will work, so long as .-separated name segments are not confused with anything else. I missed this in my last look at the draft. Is there a convention for finding documentation on such extensions based on the name (thinking of JavaDoc equivalents) or is that something that would be a developed practice outside of the OpenFormula specification? - Dennis -----Original Message----- From: Andreas J. Guelzow [mailto:aguelzow@math.concordia.ab.ca] Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 13:17 To: dennis.hamilton@acm.org Cc: robert_weir@us.ibm.com; office-formula@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [office-formula] OFFICE-2164: EASTERSUNDAY On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 12:09 -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > Perhaps this is an occasion for polishing-up a function-extension mechanism > that provides for unambiguous identification of [user-installed] third-party > supplemental-function implementations. What is wrong with the existing mechanism described in the OpenFormula draft of defining functions by an appropriate prefix, e.g. ORG.GNUMERIC.GOODFRIDAY ? Andreas > -- Andreas J. Guelzow, PhD, FTICA Mathematical & Computing Sciences Concordia University College of Alberta --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]