OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

office-formula message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [office-formula] OFFICE-2164: EASTERSUNDAY

That would work just fine.  I'm happy to see that is already there.

The Java naming convention will work, so long as .-separated name segments
are not confused with anything else.  

I missed this in my last look at the draft.

Is there a convention for finding documentation on such extensions based on
the name (thinking of JavaDoc equivalents) or is that something that would
be a developed practice outside of the OpenFormula specification?

 - Dennis 

-----Original Message-----
From: Andreas J. Guelzow [mailto:aguelzow@math.concordia.ab.ca] 
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 13:17
To: dennis.hamilton@acm.org
Cc: robert_weir@us.ibm.com; office-formula@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [office-formula] OFFICE-2164: EASTERSUNDAY

On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 12:09 -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:

> Perhaps this is an occasion for polishing-up a function-extension
> that provides for unambiguous identification of [user-installed]
> supplemental-function implementations.

What is wrong with the existing mechanism described in the OpenFormula
draft of defining functions by an appropriate prefix, e.g.


Andreas J. Guelzow, PhD, FTICA
Mathematical & Computing Sciences
Concordia University College of Alberta

To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]