[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: infix operator "<>"
Greetings! Under Semantics we say: > Returns NOT(Left = Right) if Left and Right are not Error. Note that > for Text values, if the calculation setting |table:case-sensitive| is > |false|, text is compared but characters differencing only in case are > considered equal. > But that's not right. Returns a logical, true/false. Yes? We further say: > Note that if either Left and Right are an error, the result is an > error; this operator cannot be used to determine if two errors are the > same kind of error. > > Note that in some user interfaces, this is displayed (or accepted) as > “!=” or “≠”. > OK, let's not repeat the error comparison mantra, which should be defined elsewhere as well as the text comparison text. I am assuming that the final paragraph is a true non-normative note and am marking it as such. "In some user interfaces the infix operator "<>" may be displayed as "!=" or “≠”. Raises the issue of what role does the "semantics" section play? Does it simply repeat what as already been said under summary? Or is it a place for general observations that should more properly be notes? BTW, should I be creating JIRA issues for these comments? Hope everyone is having a great day! Patrick -- Patrick Durusau patrick@durusau.net Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34 Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps) Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300 Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]