Re: [office-formula] General question (not yet a JIRA issue)

[Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net>]

Andreas,

Andreas J. Guelzow wrote:
<snip>
>> Well, but saying that a "portable" document doesn't accept some 
>> particular value isn't the same thing as saying that a portable document 
>> doesn't support Logical type.
>>     
>
> But it does mean that a portable document cannot use the TYPE function
> if the final return value of the expression may depend on whether the
> evaluator has a distinct Logical type or not.
>
>   
Well, I have been (justly in some cases) of writing obscure material.

Let's just say this rule wasn't expressed as clearly as possible. ;-)

I am looking forward to learning more about what can/should be done with 
the portable document material. Depending on how that is to be treated, 
I suspect there are a number of things that can be done to make the 
rules for such text clearer.

Hope you are looking forward to a great weekend!

Patrick

-- 
Patrick Durusau
patrick@durusau.net
Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34
Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps)
Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300
Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)