[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Year 1900 bug
Greetings! I am sweeping the draft for application/implementation -> evaluator purposes and encountered: > Applications *may* reproduce the 1900-as-leap-year bug for > compatibility purposes, but *should not*. > I suppose it is the combination of a permission with a recommendation against following that permission that strikes me as odd. Perhaps better: "Applications should reproduce the 1900-as-leap-year bug for compatibility purposes only." Yes? Hope everyone is having a great weekend! Patrick -- Patrick Durusau patrick@durusau.net Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34 Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps) Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300 Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]