[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [office-formula] Not worth a JIRA issue - 5.1 Function namesignore case. ?
1. Does the ignoring of case also apply to the use URI-mappable qualified names to identify the "namespace" of an extension-provided function and special ones like "LEGACY"? (The model is equivalent to the scheme used for the Java language.) 2. Is this one of those case-is-ignored but don't change the case that the producer used situations? 3. Or is it one of those situations where case might be honored but to be safe, never use names that differ only in case and expect them to identify separate functions? 4. If case is ignored for function names, does this impact other names (tables, arrays, sheets, defined functions, and cell coordinates)? - Dennis -----Original Message----- From: Eike Rathke [mailto:erack@sun.com] Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 04:09 To: office-formula@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [office-formula] Not worth a JIRA issue - 5.1 Function namesignore case. ? Hi Patrick, On Thursday, 2010-01-28 16:17:11 -0500, Patrick Durusau wrote: > Do we mean Functions ignore case? No. > Or do we mean that evaluators ignore the case of function names? Of course. Eike -- Automatic string conversions considered dangerous. They are the GOTO statements of spreadsheets. --Robert Weir on the OpenDocument formula subcommittee's list.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]