[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Fwd: [ext-CC] Re: CC extension
From a conversation about a new effort to add a Creative Commons extension to OOo; I just mentioned our work to them, and reply below ... Begin forwarded message: > Date: October 25, 2006 8:38:01 AM EDT > To: creativecommons@extensions.openoffice.org > Subject: Re: [ext-CC] Re: CC extension > > On Oct 25, 2006, at 3:49 AM, Malte Timmermann wrote: > >> So IMHO: >> - If the license is only a link in the document, pointing to cc.org, >> and >> you just want to remember somewhere that a license was added, use >> meta data. >> - If you want to store a local copy of the license, so people can see >> it >> w/o being online, store it in some license.xml stream in META-INF, >> next >> to the signatures. > > I think this is a false choice (metadata vs. local copy). The metadata > system would support both options. So you add this to your metadata > file: > > <cc:license > rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/"/> > > If you want, then include the RDF files as well in the package (per > above): > > <License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/"> > <permits rdf:resource="http://web.resource.org/cc/Reproduction"/> > <permits rdf:resource="http://web.resource.org/cc/Distribution"/> > <requires rdf:resource="http://web.resource.org/cc/Notice"/> > <requires rdf:resource="http://web.resource.org/cc/Attribution"/> > <permits > rdf:resource="http://web.resource.org/cc/DerivativeWorks"/> > <requires rdf:resource="http://web.resource.org/cc/ShareAlike"/> > </License> > > My point is there isn't really a need since the file is available on > the web. > > Bruce >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]