Re: [office-metadata] Metadata only for Content

[Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@gmail.com>]

On Nov 2, 2006, at 3:00 PM, Svante Schubert wrote:

>> But we wouldn't want to have "office:body" as such a 
>> metadata-enhanceable document object, would we?
> Why not? It might represent the whole document.

We already have a convention for representing the document, so not 
necessary?

> BTW a volunteer, might as transform the whole RELAX NG syntax of the 
> spec to the compact non-XML syntax.

I agree, worth considering.

> By this the syntax is more readable and furthermore the size of the 
> spec would shrink. Robert have you not mentioned this on the OOo 
> Conference? Would you like to do it?

FYI, Trang can also do Compact --> XML (and XSD). Works really well in 
fact.

Bruce