Re: [office-metadata] W3C RDFa

[Svante Schubert <Svante.Schubert@Sun.COM>]

Hi Elias,

do you know if and when it is planned that these documents will become 
Working Drafts in the terms of the W3C process [1]?
As I stated earlier they are currently "without official standing within 
the W3C".

Best regards,
Svante

[1] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/tr.html#maturity-levels


Elias Torres wrote:
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/primer
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/syntax
>
> Those are the correct links. They are not finalized, they are simply
> working drafts, but like I mentioned in the call, we have enough
> design for what we need when it comes to the set of attributes in the
> ODF XML content documents. This way we won't have a dependency on the
> standardization of RDFa. However, the closer we are to the final spec,
> the better it can be for everyone. It's also important to note, that
> we have a slightly different situation than RDFa because we have a
> custom XML set of schemas as opposed to (X)HTML to deal with so in one
> or way or another it might be hard to perfectly align ourselves with
> all of RDFa requirements and design decisions. In addition, we'll be
> using RDF/XML and other standards (like XML, RelaxNG, etc) for the
> meta.xml parts of our specification.
>
> -Elias
>
> On 11/23/06, Svante Schubert <Svante.Schubert@sun.com> wrote:
>>
>> Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
>> > On Nov 23, 2006, at 6:47 AM, Svante Schubert wrote:
>> >> PS: The RDFa link from
>> >> http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/Metadata_Field_Brainstorming does
>> >> not give clues about the specification, either.
>> >
>> > Feel free to add them.
>> Sure, as soon we know of what specification we are actually talking 
>> about.
>>
>> Svante
>>
>>