[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-metadata] two options
As you know, I also favor #2. I will post an example of an odf content file derived from a physician's office note with rdfa markup on the wiki in the next day or two. John On Dec 5, 2006, at 1520, Bruce D'Arcus wrote: > > I'd like to see if I can cut through some of the recent confusion > and keep us moving towards a solution. > > As Elias and I have been talking about this we really have two > options to fulfill our requirements and cover our use cases: > > > Option 1: The all-RDF/XML approach > ================================== > > This presumes that all metadata is stored apart from the content > file in the package, and refers from those files to document > objects in the content.xml file. The sole requirement in the > content.xml file is that the object to which one would like to > attach metadata is identified with a local or global IRI. > > The citation example I have on the wiki [1] is a complex example of > this. > > > Option 2: The Hybrid RDFa-inspired and RDF/XML approach > ======================================================= > > This would allow a handful of RDFa inspired attributes to be > attached to content nodes to give them further semantics, and then > use the separate RDF/XML files to augment those sort of semantic > anchors. > > > Discussion > ========== > > I favor Option 2 because Option 1 will prove too limited. The only > reason it works for my citation example is because I rely on the > implicit semantics associated with a hard-coded element: > text:bibliography-mark. In essence, this becomes a sort of property > of the document. But we cannot rely on these implicit semantics, > precisely because we want to enable custom solutions. > > Perhaps we can discuss this for the call next week? I suggest we > need to make a decision really soon whether we go with Option 1 or > 2, or simply bring two proposals to the TC. > > Perhaps we can discuss this in the context of one or more different > (but still complex) use cases; say the medical one? > > Bruce > > [1] <http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/Metadata_Examples> > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]