Re: [office-metadata] RDFa model and xml:id

[John Madden <john.madden@duke.edu>]

I've looked at the odf 1.x schemas. It's a little bit of a challenge  
to add attributes because the schema doesn't define a <common- 
attribs> kind of pattern that is **universal** for every single  
attribute in the schema, -----it only defines some 'families' of  
<common-attribs>- type patterns.

But that should be relatively straightforward to change.

BTW, as a general comment, it would be great if the odf.rng were a  
bit more modular. That's one GIANT schema!! How about breaking it  
down with a master schema and some includes ? My xml editor chokes!!!

John


On Dec 13, 2006, at 1039, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:

>
> On Dec 13, 2006, at 10:10 AM, Elias Torres wrote:
>
>> On another note, I'm trying to understand the actual problems we  
>> might have
>> with RDFa so I can try to address them. Is it a problem to add a  
>> handful of
>> attributes to the current ODF schemas? I'd think that if we can  
>> xml:id, it
>> shouldn't be a problem adding a few more.
>
> I'd like to flag this as an explicit agenda item for today, along  
> with copy-and-paste issue we were discussing with the citation case.
>
> Talk to you all soon.
>
> Bruce
>