Re: [office-metadata] Multiple content nodes representing on RDF subject

["Bruce D'Arcus" <bdarcus@gmail.com>]

On Dec 22, 2006, at 11:03 AM, Svante Schubert wrote:

> Just imagine there is a certain text with semantic in the content:
>
> <text:p xml:id="_foo1">This is an important and divvikult text!</ 
> text:p>
>
> which is part of a N3 statement:
>
> <#_foo1> <#isImportant> "This is an important and divvikult text!"

Note that there's no way to derive this statement from what you  
presented above. All you are doing above in the XML is identifying  
the node (as a *possible* subject).

To do that, you'd need some additional RDF/XML (or use the meta  
attributes we've been promoting):

<rdf:Description rdf:about="content.xml#_foo1">
   <ex:isImportant>This is an important and divvikult text!</ 
ex:isImportant>
</rdf:Description>

This would generate your triple.

Of course, that's a little strange, and makes more sense to do:

<rdf:Description rdf:about="content.xml#_foo1">
   <ex:status rdf:resource="http://ex.net/Important";>
</rdf:Description>

> Now a user recognizes an error in the text and marks a subset with  
> a different vocabulary.
>
> <text:p xml:id="_foo1">This is an important and </text:p>
> <text:p xml:id="_foo2">divvikult</text:p>
> <text:p xml:id="_foo3"> text!</text:p>
>
> By this a new RDF statement has been added into the existing text
>
> <#_foo2> <#typingError> "divvikult"
>
> Furthermore the earlier N3 statement has changed as well, as the  
> sum of (<#_foo1> + <#_foo2> + <#_foo3>) representing now the  
> earlier important text.

...

Maybe I'm just missing something, but am not understanding the  
problem here. Moreover, I still think you're not understanding the  
data modeling issues (the RDF). Perhaps we can see if there's a way  
to clarify?

Bruce