[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-metadata] Multiple content nodes representing on RDF subject
On Dec 22, 2006, at 6:19 PM, Svante Schubert wrote: > Obviously my example could have been chosen better as what I intended > to show, was an example of a literal to be referenced from the > metadata, which only makes sense in it's full length. You don't reference a literal, in the sense that a literal cannot be a subject. It can only be an object of a triple. > Imagine a name, quote, which looses his semantic when it's string is > reduced. There should be a nice example where the literal has to be > split, someone help me out on this? You keep using the word "semantic" which is effectively meaningless. Again, what's the subject that you want to describe, and what statement(s) do you want to make about it? If you cannot be specific about this, it's impossible to address your issue. If you must, post the entire example you have in mind. Bruce
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]