[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-metadata] Regarding the “split” problem/use-case
On Jan 17, 2007, at 7:42 AM, Florian Reuter wrote: > If I wanted to mark parts of a paragraph with metadata I would simple > use structures which are there and attach and RDF statement to it. Sure, the question is which ones? > In the given use case I would use a bookmark and attach metadata to > the bookmark. Interesting idea. Would you then disallow metadata to be attached to spans? > Bookmarks can start and end at “everywhere”. I really dislike the > object:id approach. I in general dislike that we've spent the last month on what is basically a corner case, and have been forced to invent a specific mechanism to address it. But ... > With bookmarks you can achieve the same thing as with object:id’s --- > I believe. > > E.g. consider the ODF fragment > <text:p >XXX <text:bookmark-start > text:name="_MYBOOKMARK"/>MMMMM</text:p> > <text:p >MMMM<text:bookmark-end text:name="_MYBOOKMARK"/> XXXX</text:p> > > We could then have an RDF statement like > (bookmark::_MYBOOKMARK, my:mark, “Important”) Not really. This achieves the same thing as using meta:about. It identifies a subject; not an association between objects for merging the literals (which is what the object:id attribute does). So you haven't really solved the problem ;-) Bruce
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]