Re: [office-metadata] Fwd: Public Comment on a DCMI vocabulary of domain and range classes

["Bruce D'Arcus" <bdarcus@gmail.com>]

On Feb 5, 2007, at 2:32 PM, Svante Schubert wrote:

> I guess you have in mind to give in the spec a suggestion of a set  
> of RDF vocabularies, which are currently frequently used.
> This might help later implementations, although I assume the  
> mentioning of vocabularies can only be informative in the spec as I  
> see no way how to make the usage of a RDF vocabulary mandatory in  
> an ODF application.

Yes, we can't be prescriptive, but we certainly ought to be  
informative. The average developer is going to want some smart  
suggestions here.

In my case, for example, it's important that developers use the same  
vocabularies (with optional extensions).

Bruce