Re: [office-metadata] Fwd: Public Comment on a DCMI vocabulary ofdomain and range classes

[Svante Schubert <Svante.Schubert@Sun.COM>]

Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
>
> On Feb 5, 2007, at 2:32 PM, Svante Schubert wrote:
>
>> I guess you have in mind to give in the spec a suggestion of a set of 
>> RDF vocabularies, which are currently frequently used.
>> This might help later implementations, although I assume the 
>> mentioning of vocabularies can only be informative in the spec as I 
>> see no way how to make the usage of a RDF vocabulary mandatory in an 
>> ODF application.
>
> Yes, we can't be prescriptive, but we certainly ought to be 
> informative. The average developer is going to want some smart 
> suggestions here.
>
> In my case, for example, it's important that developers use the same 
> vocabularies (with optional extensions).
>
I fully agree. We might already start collecting, although this task has 
not the highest priority, it might be easy to do this aside.