[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-metadata] Aggreement on annotating content with RDF attributes
Problem 1 is, I have no idea where the wiki page that Benrd posted is. It's not linked from the any of the metadata pages as near as I can tell. Ah, I found it: <http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/ExampleDocument> On Feb 9, 2007, at 1:54 PM, Svante Schubert wrote: > Let's start immediately to find solutions for real world cases > (Bernd's examples) and define them for the proposal. > So just for instance, even if someone would like to edit RDF XML via > XForms, we would now add RDF attributes to the text field with the > xforms:binding. The xforms:binding part is the aspect that I don't think Elias and I accept. I just thought Michael said we'd keep keep xpath apart from the RDF stuff, and now here we see it again, mixing incompatible models. I'll address the use case though ... > Let us go into detail regarding RDF annotations, how would we solve > Bernd's scenario #1: > > The following RDF object literals is taken from the VCARD XML file [1]. > From the RDF subject "from http://www.1dok.org/staff#schuster007" the > related <vCard:Family> should be used in the content.xml. I want to stop right here and ask us to clarify this use case. What *exactly* is a user wanting to do here? Please explain in the language of a user; not an implementor. Bruce
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]