[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-metadata] Groups - Metadata_Model_Proposal (07-02-19-ODF-MetaData.odt) uploaded
Thanks for the work guys. On Feb 19, 2007, at 4:51 PM, patrick@durusau.net wrote: > Please send comments and suggestions along with *proposed* revision > language keyed to the section that you think needs revision. Some quick things that jump out: 1) Section 1.2.2 a. The metadata attributes for about and property need to be in a namespace other than the rdf namespace. I have typically been assuming meta. b. We need a meta:resource attribute to support objects that are resources (not literals) in content (like citations). 2) The field stuff is confusing to me. For example: > If a text literal is being created based on metadata, the text > literal should be embedded into the element 'meta:text-get'. I can't see where a "text literal" would be "created" in any of our use cases. The only agent that will be creating in-content literals are users. Elias' demo is an example of this. What might be created in many cases are *labels* for object *resources*. The citation case is an example of this. As I have been thinking of it, there are two kinds of in-content metadata statements: ones where the objects are literals (strings, say), and ones where they are resources (IRIs). The former is encoded using meta:about and meta:property attributes, where the content of the element (or the value attribute) is the object, while in the second the content of the element is just a (in many cases generated) label for display. I don't have a suggested change because this section is not (yet) clear to me. It might be as simple as changing the word "literal" to "label" above? 3) On this comment: [Patrick: We might want to create a own IRI ODF Schema] I doubt we need to. I suggest we might list some good ones to use (LSIDs, etc.) 4) run spellcheck in U.S. English ;-) Will take a closer look later. BTW, I'm going to be late for the meeting this week, so will try to raise any issues here. Bruce
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]