[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-metadata] "Logical/abstract" vs. "physical" representation
Bruce D'Arcus wrote: > > On Mar 5, 2007, at 9:09 AM, Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - > Hamburg wrote: > >> So, I fear solving this issue is unfortunately outside the scope of >> our TC. We may, however, provide some informative hints how to solve >> this issue, but we should keep this discussions separate from the >> discussions about the file format. > > It may be that solving the issue of what specific base URI to use (uuid > vs. lsid) is outside our scope, and we only want to make suggestions. > But we need to clearly establish how subject URIs are constructed, which > means we have to require some mechanism to do that. > > Right? Yes. But I thought we have already a proposal for this (#1 in http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-metadata/200702/msg00160.html So, what is missing (except a detailed proposal by which attribute the base IRI may be defined in the manifest)? Michael
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]