Re: [office-metadata] Atom and document/feed IRIs

[Svante Schubert <Svante.Schubert@Sun.COM>]

Patrick Durusau wrote:
> I thought we were talking about assigning IRIs to identify documents? 
> Rather than path statements.
You might be right. I took this for an argument for IRI against relative 
links to xml:id on ODF elements.

Isn't the identification (IRI) of mails and feeds given after they are 
modified, when they are read-only in their remaining life-cycle?
Regarding unique identification of ODF documents, generating hash value 
appear more consistent instead of IRIs.
Would it not make more sense for us to use an IRI given from an RDF 
application, like a Invoice IRI?
I say, leave the identification to the RDF application, which can 
clarify what makes an ODF document unique in their eyes.

Svante.