[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-metadata] Further examples needed
On Mar 9, 2007, at 10:29 AM, Svante Schubert wrote: > Especially examples about the RDF manifest description using OWL, > instead using RelaxNG, to enable more flexibility for the future would > be helpful to change the current proposal. I'm not sure if Elias (?) meant to suggest we need something so formal in our proposal as an OWL ontology*, but we at minimum need a list of properties we'd consider a baseline. Bruce * it seems to me we could just have that as supplement at the HTTP address the namespace URI would resolve to?
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]