Re: [office-metadata] clarifying fields and metadata

[Bruce D'Arcus <bruce.darcus@OpenDocument.us>]

On Mar 13, 2007, at 10:33 AM, Elias Torres wrote:

> I like this. Question: and we need text:meta-label because of the 
> read-only
> nature? If so, why not use text:field?

Yeah, my question as well. It gets to the strategic vision of this 
proposal, really. WRT to my other note, would we use this to support 
conversion from OOXML structured fields, for example? If yes, should we 
make clear that these are "fields"?

Bruce