Re: [office-metadata] Binding proposal(s) status for the call

[Bruce D'Arcus <bruce.darcus@OpenDocument.us>]

Svante -- can you please adjust this (particularly point 3) to account 
for my point yesterday about xml:base?

<rdf:RDF xml:base="urn:uuid:8038103340134304:">

   <rdf:Description rdf:about="content.xml:foo">
     ...
   </rdf:Description>

</rdf:RDF>

On Mar 21, 2007, at 8:19 AM, Svante Schubert wrote:

> The latter is an odf: URL, which refers only to in-package content.
> I favor it for several reasons:
>
> 1) If someone would like to rename the document (an expected Office 
> feature), all document internal bindings stay valid. The ODF 
> application changing the docID will NOT interfere with RDF/XML data!
> 2) The docID is likely to be only unique in controlled work-flows. 
> Using it always, gives a wrong implication.
> 3) Size & readability advantages
> 4) Only before extracting data relative to the document, it will be 
> made global, the one extracting the information has still the choice 
> using the docID or the location URL, but might as well add owl:sameAs 
> to give a relation of location and docID. By this it would have at 
> least a chance to realize same docIDs for several files.