Namespaces

[Svante Schubert <Svante.Schubert@Sun.COM>]

> [Wed:16:10:27] <Svante> 3. Open issues on manifest ontology
> [Wed:16:10:37] <flr> Discussion about 3.
> [Wed:16:11:41] <flr> open issues: URLs
> [Wed:16:12:46] <darcusb> Integrating Elias' W3C best practice approach 
> with the dates included would instead yield something like this I guess:
> manifest --> <http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/2007/03/meta/manifest>
> meta --> <http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/2007/03/meta>

The xml prefixes meta and manifest are already taken in the ODF 
specification.

For now I used in the metadata manifest the prefix 'm' with the URL 
http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/2007/03/meta/manifest and reuse the 
existing 'meta' prefix with the existing namespace, 
urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:meta:1.0

For me this is just a naming issue, I would suggest to postpone this 
issue beyond the ODF related RDF vocabulary and the new metadata element 
discussion.

Svante.