[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-metadata] fields proposal
OK. On Mar 26, 2007, at 6:14 AM, Svante Schubert wrote: > I assume there is only one rule: > All ODF application that do not want to support metadata should be > able to display a document with metadata similar to any other ODF > application. Agree. > Due to this, whenever a string is similar to a RDF literal and being > edited in the viewed content, the string and the RDF statement have to > be in-content (the RDFa approach). > For any other metadata there exist no rule nor a guideline. The choice > is completely up to the RDF application. > For example, the content created from a RDF application based on > metadata - viewed in the document - is placed in a text:meta-field. > But how the RDF statements are attached to the field (in-content vs. > RDF/XML) is irrelevant. This I don't agree with. We have to account for the in-content encoding in the RELAX NG schema and spec, or it won't be an option. My use case requires that the citation fields be round-trippable between different ODF applications (and also, realistically, other formats). So I'd like us to keep that requirement in mind when deciding on this. > Moreover if the field had been generated by some algorithm, the > description of this process does not have to be part of the document. > For example, when a plugin would offer the relation between "Last > Tuesday of the year" to a xsd:date. Agree. Bruce
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]