Re: [office-metadata] Update on metadata manifest

[Svante Schubert <Svante.Schubert@Sun.COM>]

Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
>
> On Apr 3, 2007, at 2:29 PM, Svante Schubert wrote:
>
>>> Question: why encode the bindings in the manifest?
>> Answer: To abstract the metadata (aside of the meta manifest) from 
>> the physical (file) representation.
>
> No, I understand the abstraction, and that seems fine; I am asking 
> about why in the manifest?
The abstraction is done by separating the binding from the other RDF/XML 
files, correct?
If you suggest to split the manifest entries from the bindings into 
different files, please say so. Otherwise please state what you have in 
mind.

We asked the question of splitting the bindings from the manifest in the 
last line of our mail -> [ Are two RDF graphs/files better for Sample IV?]

Svante