Re: [office-metadata] Proposal on new Meta Manifest due to last call's discussion

[Bruce D'Arcus <bruce.darcus@OpenDocument.us>]

On Apr 13, 2007, at 2:29 PM, Svante Schubert wrote:

> This would make a wording for the spec much easier - a good sign for 
> the ease of understanding.
> And now I would be able to give two new statements to solve our IRC 
> call problem:
>
> odf:File dcterms:hasPart odf:Element .
> odf:File dcterms:references odf:Element .

Interesting conclusion.

...

> One nice side effect, we do not need the mm namespace any longer.
> Furthermore, I exchanged the odf: namespace to 
> xmlns:odf="http://docs.oasis-open.org/opendocument/meta/package#";
> and suggest not to add a new namespace for m:, but reuse the existing 
> meta: namespace for our four content attributes instead, see [3] for 
> details.

I don't know. Many people (including me) consider bad practice to use 
urns for namespace URIs. Since we're introducing a new metadata system, 
it seems to make sense that it would get a new namespace.

Bruce