[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-metadata] Proposal on new Meta Manifest due to last call's discussion
On Apr 13, 2007, at 2:29 PM, Svante Schubert wrote: > This would make a wording for the spec much easier - a good sign for > the ease of understanding. > And now I would be able to give two new statements to solve our IRC > call problem: > > odf:File dcterms:hasPart odf:Element . > odf:File dcterms:references odf:Element . Interesting conclusion. ... > One nice side effect, we do not need the mm namespace any longer. > Furthermore, I exchanged the odf: namespace to > xmlns:odf="http://docs.oasis-open.org/opendocument/meta/package#" > and suggest not to add a new namespace for m:, but reuse the existing > meta: namespace for our four content attributes instead, see [3] for > details. I don't know. Many people (including me) consider bad practice to use urns for namespace URIs. Since we're introducing a new metadata system, it seems to make sense that it would get a new namespace. Bruce
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]