Re: [office-metadata] finishing up

[Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@gmail.com>]

On May 2, 2007, at 8:53 AM, Svante Schubert wrote:

> Your objection seems correct, we should not redefine existing 
> properties. But by removing this section completely we would lose the 
> definition of the relation between odf:Package and odf:File.
> What would be the common way to solve this problem when using OWL?
> The creation of a subproperty of dcterms:hasPart (e.g. odf:contains) 
> could be a possible solution, like:
>
> contains
>    Indicates a File that belongs to the Package.
>    Sub-property of: dcterm:hasPart
>    Domain: Package
>    Range: File

First question is if we care if we have those domains and ranges.

If we do, then I think your approach is right.

Bruce