Fwd: language

[Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@gmail.com>]

Argh ... cc-ed the wrong list ...

Begin forwarded message:
>
>
> Hmm, this is a little tricky; going to cc this to the list in case 
> anyone else has thoughts ...
>
> On Jun 27, 2007, at 8:37 AM, Svante Schubert wrote:
>
>> Which version do prefer, the third is currently in the spec:
>>
>> "The odf:Package resource description in the metadata manifest 
>> represents the OpenDocument package itself."
>> or
>> "The odf:Package node in the metadata manifest represents the 
>> OpenDocument package itself."
>> or
>> "The odf:Package in the metadata manifest represents the OpenDocument 
>> package itself."
>
> The problem is that you are assuming a particular syntax;
>
> <odf:Package>
> ...
> </odf:Package>
>
> ... rather than:
>
> <rdf:Description>
>   <rdf:type rdf:resource="[uri]"/>
> </rdf:Description>
>
> To "odf:Package node" in the second case wouldn't make sense. To be 
> more precise, maybe something like:
>
> "The odf:Package class refers to the OpenDocument package itself."
>
> Bruce
>