Re: [office-metadata] Fwd: language

[Svante Schubert <Svante.Schubert@Sun.COM>]

Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
>> On Jun 27, 2007, at 8:37 AM, Svante Schubert wrote:
>>
>>> Which version do prefer, the third is currently in the spec:
>>>
>>> "The odf:Package resource description in the metadata manifest 
>>> represents the OpenDocument package itself."
>>> or
>>> "The odf:Package node in the metadata manifest represents the 
>>> OpenDocument package itself."
>>> or
>>> "The odf:Package in the metadata manifest represents the 
>>> OpenDocument package itself."
>>
>> The problem is that you are assuming a particular syntax;
>>
>> <odf:Package>
>> ...
>> </odf:Package>
>>
>> ... rather than:
>>
>> <rdf:Description>
>>   <rdf:type rdf:resource="[uri]"/>
>> </rdf:Description>
>>
>> To "odf:Package node" in the second case wouldn't make sense. 
I would assume that it is still an RDF odf:Package node, but just no 
longer an XML odf:Package node.
>> To be more precise, maybe something like:
>> "The odf:Package class refers to the OpenDocument package itself."
Isn't precisely the individual of an odf:Package class referring to the 
OpenDocument package itself?

Svante