Re: [Fwd: Re: [office-metadata] Reuse of metadata proposal for non ODFapplications]

[Svante Schubert <Svante.Schubert@Sun.COM>]

Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
> Svante Schubert wrote:
>
>> Nevertheless it seems the odf:Field is just semantic sugar, but not 
>> really necessary, as the relation to the text:meta-field is made by 
>> the [uri].
>
> Are you listening to me Svante?
>
>> It seems even better to use <citation:Field> instead of the 
>> <odf:Field> to define a citation:prefix and suffix as it is not clear 
>> that all text:meta-field would use this prefix/suffix mechanism as it 
>> is currently not defined in ODF.
>
> Are you saying NO field is going to use it?
>
> This is getting ridiculous.
>
> Bruce
Obviously I have not understand what you have been trying to tell me.
On my questions in my previous mail you might see were I was not certain 
what you have been explaining.

Please try again, believe me I am willing to listen.

Thanks in advance,
Svante