office-metadata message

Subject: Re: [office-metadata] Minor Draft Change: Usage of Data Styles on Meta Fields

From: Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@gmail.com>
To: "John F. Madden, MD, PhD" <john.madden@duke.edu>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 15:37:11 -0400


On Sep 6, 2007, at 3:32 PM, John F. Madden, MD, PhD wrote:

> Looking at the ODF Metadata OWL ontology, a couple of quick questions:
>
> (1) Should odf:MetadataFile, odf:StylesFile and odf:ContentFile be 
> explicity stated to be rdfs:subclassOf common:File  ?

Seems sensible.

> (2) Should we specify a domain and range on common:hasPart ?

Yes. What would you propose they be? [am too busy to think about 
details!]

Bruce

References:
- Minor Draft Change: Usage of Data Styles on Meta Fields
  - From: Svante Schubert <Svante.Schubert@Sun.COM>
- Re: [office-metadata] Minor Draft Change: Usage of Data Styles on Meta Fields
  - From: "John F. Madden, MD, PhD" <john.madden@duke.edu>
- Re: [office-metadata] Minor Draft Change: Usage of Data Styles on MetaFields
  - From: Svante Schubert <Svante.Schubert@Sun.COM>
- Re: [office-metadata] Minor Draft Change: Usage of Data Styles on Meta Fields
  - From: "John F. Madden, MD, PhD" <john.madden@duke.edu>