Re: [office-metadata] Minor Draft Change: Usage of Data Styles onMeta Fields

[Elias Torres <elias@torrez.us>]

John F. Madden, MD, PhD wrote:
> Guys,
> 
> Looking at the ODF Metadata OWL ontology, a couple of quick questions:
> 
> (1) Should odf:MetadataFile, odf:StylesFile and odf:ContentFile be 
> explicity stated to be rdfs:subclassOf common:File  ?

Looks like a good thing.

> 
> i.e.currently:
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> possible alternative:
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> (2) Should we specify a domain and range on common:hasPart ?

I'm not up-to-speed on this one. But if possible, why not?

> 
> John
>