[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-requirements] Re: [office] Questions and Answers -Asterisks, Attendance, and Issues Lists
Hi Mary, On 10/22/08 23:38, Mary McRae wrote: > Hi Bob, > > I promise to bring it up on tomorrow's staff call. It's not an IT issue; > the subcommittee is not able to make any decisions, approve any documents, > etc. All of that must happen at the main TC level. The IPR is associated > with the main TC, as is the comment list, and the feedback license. So we > would need to tweak something or other to make that work. I also hope to > have a better answer for you with regard to tracking all those anticipated > comments within a week's time. I don't think we have an issue in the SC if the new list is on the main TC level. So, a 2nd comment list which behaves like the original office-comment list should work. But that's only a suggestion that may or may not be easy to implement. There may be other options, too. Best regards Michael > > Regards, > > Mary > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Bob Jolliffe [mailto:bobjolliffe@gmail.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 5:00 PM >> To: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org >> Cc: office-requirements@lists.oasis-open.org >> Subject: [office-requirements] Re: [office] Questions and Answers - >> Asterisks, Attendance, and Issues Lists >> >> Hello Mary >> >> The requirements SC had a meeting yesterday and as you might imagine, >> the question of tooling to deal with the expected volume of comments >> was a central concern. >> >> There was a strong consensus (unanimity in fact) that a separate >> comment list for the SC would be very useful in keeping the bulk of >> the traffic separate and faciliitating a certain amount of automated >> post-processing. Whereas it would be possible to search out the >> requirements messages from the main TC comments list (provided some >> agreed keyword is used), members feel that the extra volume of mail on >> the main comments list would be disruptive and potentially confusing >> for those not involved in the work of the requirements SC. And there >> is no easy way to ensure that contributors will follow such a request >> diligently. >> >> Can I humbly request that we re-examine the possibility of setting up >> such a separate list. Though I am sensitive to the fact that your >> sysadmin folk are stretched it seems that setting up a mailing list >> might be considerably less effort than trying to host some complex >> issue tracking system. >> >> Regards >> Bob >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that >> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: >> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php > -- Michael Brauer, Technical Architect Software Engineering StarOffice/OpenOffice.org Sun Microsystems GmbH Nagelsweg 55 D-20097 Hamburg, Germany michael.brauer@sun.com http://sun.com/staroffice +49 40 23646 500 http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1, D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Thomas Schroeder, Wolfgang Engels, Dr. Roland Boemer Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Haering
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]