[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Multiple object renditions proposal
On Wednesday 04 June 2003 18:31, Philip Boutros wrote: > Hi > > The current specification mixes the definition of a frame and its > attributes (position, size, border, etc.) and the definition of it's > contents. I believe the correct way to modify the specification is to > add an explicit office:frame (or draw:frame) element and move all the > "frame" attributes up to it. It's contents then become 1..n of the > existing "frame" elements > (text-box,image,applet,plugin,object,object-ole) minus all the frame > attributes. The order of these elements under the office:frame element > dictates the applications preference for use with the first child being > the most preferred. I like this proposal very much. (I would even favour office:frame over draw:frame, but this doesn't matter much). -- David FAURE, faure@kde.org, sponsored by Trolltech to work on KDE, Konqueror (http://www.konqueror.org), and KOffice (http://www.koffice.org). Qtella users - stability patches at http://blackie.dk/~dfaure/qtella.html
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]