[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] 2.1 Document Roots
On Thursday 28 October 2004 13:53, Patrick Durusau wrote: > Greetings! > > I have been over this section several times over a couple of days trying > to decide why it seems confusing. > > Before suggesting any changes, let me test my understanding of what it > is saying. > > <office:document> The root element if, and only if, the document is > being represented in a single XML document. Yes. > If the document is being represented in a package (section 17), there is > no <office:document> root element and in that case Yes > <office:document-content>, etc., are all contained in > > <manifest:manifest > xmlns:manifest="urn:oasis:names:tc:openoffice:xmlns:manifest:1.0"> > > within: > > <manifest:file-entry> elements. ??? No, the manifest is in another file... Example extract of content.xml from a ZIP structure: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <office:document-content xmlns:office=" ....."> ... And extract of META-INF/manifest.xml from the same ZIP structure: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <manifest:manifest xmlns:manifest="urn:oasis:names:tc:openoffice:xmlns:manifest:1.0"> <manifest:file-entry manifest:media-type="" manifest:full-path="/"/> </manifest:manifest> -- David Faure, faure@kde.org, sponsored by Trolltech to work on KDE, Konqueror (http://www.konqueror.org), and KOffice (http://www.koffice.org).
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]