Re: [office] 2.1 Document Roots

[David Faure <faure@kde.org>]

On Thursday 28 October 2004 13:53, Patrick Durusau wrote:
> Greetings!
> 
> I have been over this section several times over a couple of days trying 
> to decide why it seems confusing.
> 
> Before suggesting any changes, let me test my understanding of what it 
> is saying.
> 
> <office:document> The root element if, and only if, the document is 
> being represented in a single XML document.
Yes.

> If the document is being represented in a package (section 17), there is 
> no <office:document> root element and in that case
Yes

> <office:document-content>, etc., are all contained in
> 
> <manifest:manifest 
> xmlns:manifest="urn:oasis:names:tc:openoffice:xmlns:manifest:1.0">
> 
> within:
> 
> <manifest:file-entry> elements.

??? No, the manifest is in another file...

Example extract of content.xml from a ZIP structure:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<office:document-content xmlns:office=" .....">
  ...

And extract of META-INF/manifest.xml from the same ZIP structure:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<manifest:manifest xmlns:manifest="urn:oasis:names:tc:openoffice:xmlns:manifest:1.0">
 <manifest:file-entry manifest:media-type="" manifest:full-path="/"/>
</manifest:manifest>

-- 
David Faure, faure@kde.org, sponsored by Trolltech to work on KDE,
Konqueror (http://www.konqueror.org), and KOffice (http://www.koffice.org).