[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] RE: Submission of the OpdnDocument CD3 for OASISstandardization
Hi Mary, Mary McRae wrote: > Hi Michael, > > We need to clean up a few things before I can issue the call for vote on Friday. > > 1. cover page - Jason Harrop's company is listed, but Jason is an individual member of OASIS. Having your company name listed is > one of the benefits of corporate memebership. I've changed that in the committee draft. The new version is available at http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/12027/office-spec-1.0-cd-3.pdf and http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/12028/office-spec-1.0-cd-3.sxw > > 2. certification by OASIS member organizations: neither Koffice nor OpenOffice are OASIS members which leaves you one short; I think > you have plenty of certifications from OASIS member companies, you just need to resubmit the email below showing all of those that > have sent certifications that are member companies. I will include the additional certifications we have received. > > 3. appendix - can you copy this into a document or spreadsheet and upload to Kavi? That way I can link to it rather than having to > incorporate the comments directly. Just include the link when you re-send the submission email. I've created a spreadsheet document. It's available at http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/12030/public-review-feedback.sxw > > Please have the updated documents and submissions to be my end of day Thursday; if there's any problem let me know and I'll be > happy to help out in any way that I can. I will send you the updated submission today. > > Regards, > > Mary Best regards Michael > > --------------------------------------------------- > Mary P McRae > OASIS > Manager of TC Administration > email: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org > web: www.oasis-open.org > phone: 603.232.9090 > cell: 603.557.7985 > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Michael Brauer [mailto:Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM] >>Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 10:27 AM >>To: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org >>Subject: Submission of the OpdnDocument CD3 for OASIS standardization >> >>Hi Mary, >> >>the OpenDocument TC has voted for submitting the OpenDocument >>Committee Draft 3 to OASIS membership for consideration as an >>OASIS Standard: >> >>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/office/ballot.php?id=701 >> >>As authorized by this vote, I am hereby submitting the >>OpenDocument Committee Draft 3 for OASIS standardization. >> >>The OASIS TC process states: >> >> A TC may recommend that the Committee Draft be made an OASIS >> Standard. Upon resolution of the TC to move the specification >> forward, its chair shall submit the following items to OASIS TC >> Administration: >> >> 1. A formal specification that is a valid member of its type, >> together with appropriate documentation for the >> specification, both of which must be written using approved >> OASIS templates; >> >> 2. A clear English-language summary of the specification; >> >> 3. A statement regarding the relationship of this specification >> to similar work of other OASIS TCs or other standards >> developing organizations; >> >> 4. Certification by at least three OASIS member organizations >> that they are successfully using the specification >> consistently with the OASIS IPR Policy; >> >> 5. An account of each of the comments/issues raised during the >> public review period, along with its resolution; >> >> 6. An account of and results of the voting to approve the >> approve the specification as a Committee Draft; >> >> 7. An account of or pointer to votes and comments received in >> any earlier attempts to standardize substantially the same >> specification, together with the originating TC's response >> to each comment; >> >> 8. A pointer to the publicly visible comments archive for the >> originating TC; >> >> 9. A statement from the chair of the TC certifying that all >> members of the TC have been provided with a copy of the >> OASIS IPR Policy; and >> >> 10. Optionally, a pointer to any minority reports submitted by >> one or more TC members who did not vote in favor of >> approving the Committee Draft, or certification by the chair >> that no minority reports exist. >> >>The following items are hereby submitted pursuant to the >>OASIS requirements cited above. >> >>1. A formal specification that is a valid member of its type, >> together with appropriate documentation for the specification, >> both of which must be written using approved OASIS templates >> >> See Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) >> 1.0 Committee Draft 3, in particular, the three embedded >> normative Relax-NG schemas. >> >> The specification document is available in PDF format at >> >>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/11681/office >>-spec-1.0-cd-3.pdf >> >> and in OpenOffice.org XML format at >> >>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/11682/office >>-spec-1.0-cd-3.sxw. >> >> >> For convenience, the embedded Relax-NG schemas are also >> available as separate files. These files have been extracted >> automatically from the specification schema (in the event of >> a conflict, only the embedded ones are normative): >> >> OpenDocument Relax-NG Schema (extracted from chapter 1 to 16 >> of the specification): >> >>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/11680/office >>-schema-1.0-cd-3.rng >> >> >> OpenDocument Manifest Relax-NG Schema (extracted from chapter >> 17 of the specification): >> >>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/11679/office >>-manifest-schema-1.0-cd-3.rng >> >> >> OpenDocument Strict Relax-NG Schema (extracted from appendix A >> of the specification): >> >>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/11678/office >>-strict-schema-1.0-cd-3.rng >> >> >> >>2. A clear English-language summary of the specification >> >> The OpenDocument specification defines an XML schema for >> office applications and its semantics. The schema is suitable >> for office documents, including text documents, spreadsheets, >> charts and graphical documents like drawings or presentations, >> but is not restricted to these kinds of documents. >> >> The schema provides for high-level information suitable for >> editing documents. It defines suitable XML structures for >> office documents and is friendly to transformations using XSLT >> or similar XML-based tools. >> >> >>3. A statement regarding the relationship of this specification to >> similar work of other OASIS TCs or other standards developing >> organizations >> >> OpenDocument makes use of the following standards, either by >> direct inclusion, or by adopting some of their concepts, >> elements and attribute names, or semantics: >> >> Dublin Core Metadata Element Set >> W3C (X)HTML >> W3C MathML >> W3C SMIL >> W3C SVG >> W3C XLink >> W3C XForms >> W3C XSL FO >> >> While all these standards cover some aspects of documents >> created by office applications, none of these standards covers >> all aspects of such documents, or could be extended to cover >> all these aspects. >> >> OpenDocument is based on the open source community developed >> OpenOffice.org XML file format. >> >> >>4. Certification by at least three OASIS member organizations that >> they are successfully using the specification consistently with >> the OASIS IPR Policy >> >> The following OASIS member organizations have certified to >> the TC that they are successfully using OpenDocument: >> >> Sun Microsystems >> >>http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200502/msg00015.html >> >> KOffice (represented By Mr. David Faure) >> >>http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200502/msg00016.html >> >> OpenOffice.org (represented by Mr. Gary Edwards) >> >>http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200502/msg00026.html >> >> Stellent >> >>http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200503/msg00012.html >> >> >>5. An account of each of the comments/issues raised during the >> public review period, along with its resolution. >> >> The public review took place for the OpenDocument Committee >> Draft 2. Comments submitted regarding the OpenDocument review >> of January 2005, together with their disposition by the TC, can >> be found in the appendix at the end of this document >> >> Where the TC considered it to be essential, the comments have >> been addressed in the Committee Draft 3, which is the basis of >> this submission. The TC considers the changes made between >> committee draft 2 and 3 to be not substantive, and therefore >> did not conduct another review. A list of changes made from >> Committee Draft 2 to Committee Draft 3 is available in appendix >> E.2 of the specification. >> >> It should be noted that the Committee Draft 1 (called Open >> Office specification) is available publicly since March, the >> 22th 2004. >> >> >>6. An account of and results of the voting to approve the >> specification as a Committee Draft >> >> Results of the CD ballot can be found at >> >>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/office/ballot.php?id=699 >> >> >>7. An account of or pointer to votes and comments received in any >> earlier attempts to standardize substantially the same >> specification, together with the originating TC's response to >> each comment >> >> OpenDocument has not previously been submitted for OASIS >> standardization. >> >> >>8. A pointer to the publicly visible comments archive for the >> originating TC >> >> The OpenDocument comment archive is located at >> >> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/ >> >> >>9. A statement from the chair of the TC certifying that all >> members of the TC have been provided with a copy of the OASIS >> IPR Policy >> >> Members of the TC were formally notified by email in the >> message archived at >> >> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200502/msg00012.html >> >> >>10. Optionally, a pointer to any minority reports submitted by one >> or more TC members who did not vote in favor of approving the >> Committee Draft, or certification by the chair that no minority >> reports exist. >> >> No minority reports were submitted. >> >>Michael Brauer >> >>Chair, OASIS OpenDocument TC >> >> >>APPENDIX >> >>List of comments/issues raised during the public review >>period, along with its resolution. >> >>1. Improved definition of formula syntax: >> >>http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200501/msg >>00000.html >>http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200502/msg >>00000.html >> >> Resolution: The TC thinks that having interoperability on that >> level would be of great benefit to users, but does not believe >> that this is in the scope of the current specification, >> especially since the formula syntax is not specifically related >> to the actual XML format the specification describes. >> >> >>2. Support for custom schemas >> >>http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200501/msg >>00002.html >> >> Resolution: The TC considers custom schema support to be not >> essential for the current version of the specification, but >> had already identified custom schema support >> as a possible enhancement for a future version of the >> specification before the public review has started. >> >> >>3. Usage of SVG namespace >> >>http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200501/msg >>00005.html >> >> Resolution: The TC discussed the usage of the SVG namespace with >> the W3C SVG working group and agreed with them to not include >> the W3C SVG namespace any longer, but to define a new one within >> the OpenDocument specification that contains the attributes and >> element that were previously imported from the SVG namespace. >> >> Since the W3C XSL-FO and W3C SMIL namespaces were used in the >> same way as the SVG namespace, the TC further agreed to >> take the same action for these namespaces. >> >> The TC further discussed the usage of the W3C XForms namespace >> with the W3C XForms working group. As a result of these >> discussions, the TC agreed to rename the xforms:submission >> attribute to form:xforms-submission. >> >> The above changes, together with the update of a non normative >> appendix, resulted in Committee Draft 3. >> >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: office-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org > For additional commands, e-mail: office-help@lists.oasis-open.org > -- Michael Brauer Phone: +49 40 23646 500 Technical Architect Software Engineering Fax: +49 40 23646 550 StarOffice Development Sun Microsystems GmbH Sachsenfeld 4 D-20097 Hamburg, Germany e-mail: michael.brauer@sun.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]