[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Formula Sub Committee Draft Charter
robert_weir@us.ibm.com wrote: > ... > Is there any value of N in the above proposal which you would find > satisfactory? In other words, are you willing to make a best-attempt at > convincing and turning around OASIS on this point, but then, after a > certain date, be willing to cut your losses and make up lost time on the > Subcommittee if that fails? I'd be pleased if we all agreed on the > general outline of the above proposal, but differed in preferences for > N. That at least gives a point for negotiation. In the end, I'm > willing to be open minded, but not willing to be open ended. I wholeheartedly agree to this. We cannot reach our goal of defining formulas for OpenDocument, which already is an OASIS standard under OASIS IPR rules by debating those very rules. Bests -Lars -- Lars Oppermann <lars.oppermann@sun.com> Sun Microsystems Software Engineer - StarOffice Sachsenfeld 4 Phone: +49 40 23646 959 D-20097 Hamburg Fax: +49 40 23646 550 http://www.sun.com/staroffice
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]