office message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Formula Sub Committee Draft Charter
- From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com
- To: office@lists.oasis-open.org, Chris Nokleberg <chris@sixlegs.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 16:36:15 -0500
Chris Nokleberg <chris@sixlegs.com> wrote on
02/03/2006 03:58:34 PM:
> > That's fine with me. Whatever we end up with with needs
to be
> > formally specified, so unless we define the syntax of BNF in
a
> > self-contained way, we'll need to refer to an external standard.
> > Whether it is XML 1.1, or RFC 2234 isn't as important to me as
the
> > fact that we're following some authority.
>
> In case it has been forgotten, the OpenDocument 1.0 spec already
> includes a BNF for the draw:formula attribute. The spreadsheet formula
> spec should probably use the same BNF syntax. The obvious problem
being
> that the syntax of the BNF used for draw:formula is not specified.
>
Good catch. 9.5.5 "Enhanced
Geometry". No authority cited there. But certainly makes
sense that all BNF's in ODF should use the same syntax.
-Rob
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]