[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [office] OASIS process
ODF 1.0 has passed step #6 already. I understand your question to mean where the process for ODF 1.1 should start. I expect that to be step #1. Waldo Bastian Linux Client Architect - Channel Platform Solutions Group Intel Corporation - http://www.intel.com/go/linux OSDL DTL Tech Board Chairman ________________________________________ From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com [mailto:robert_weir@us.ibm.com] Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 6:18 AM To: OpenDocument Mailing List Subject: Re: [office] OASIS process Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> wrote on 03/17/2006 06:59:20 AM: > > 1. The OpenDocument TC approves a specification as committee draft. > 2. A public review of the committee draft takes place for a minimum > of 60 days. > 3. If comments are received that require a change of the specification, the > spcification is changed accordingly, and a public review of the changes takes > place for 15 days. This step may be repeated. > 4. The TC approves the specification as committee specification. > 5. The TC submits the Committee Specification to the membership of OASIS for > consideration as an OASIS Standard. This submission must be requested by the > 15th of a month. > 6. Starting at the 1st of the next month, the voting takes place. So, the question is this: If we make changes to ODF 1.0 in response to comments, does this send us back to step #1? Or does that send us back to step #3? -Rob
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]