[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Re: [office-accessibility] Re: [office] Accessibility SC Proposal for alternative text
On May 4, 2006, at 7:20 PM, Peter Korn wrote: > By all means, please suggest alternative solutions to the ones we > suggest. I dug out an example from Florian*, since it's easier for me to see the XML. So here's what we have now from that message: <text:p> <draw:frame> <!-- outer frame --> <draw:text-box> <text:p> <draw:frame> <draw:image> <office:binary-data>picture data here....</office:binary-data> </draw:image> </draw:frame> <!-- "real"frame --> Caption Text </text:p> </draw:text-box> </draw:frame> </text:p> I agree, that's problematic, and not only for accessibility. My understanding is that the proposal would do something like: <text:p> <draw:frame> <!-- outer frame --> <draw:text-box> <draw:frame> <draw:image draw:describedBy="caation-1"> <office:binary-data>picture data here....</office:binary-data> </draw:image> </draw:frame> <!-- "real" frame --> <text:p xml:id="caption-1">Caption Text</text:p> </draw:text-box> </draw:frame> </text:p> Is that all correct? Bruce * <http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/office-accessibility/200603/ msg00013.html>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]