[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [office] OpenDocument TC Coordination Call Minutes 2006-05-08
Attendees --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yue Ma, IBM Patrick Durusau, Individual Jody Goldberg, Novell Michael Brauer, Sun Microsystems Lars Oppermann, Sun Microsystems Eike Rathke, Sun Microsystems Florian Reuter, Sun Microsystems Gary Edwards, The OpenDocument Foundation David Wheeler, The OpenDocument Foundation Chris Nokelberg, Tonic Systems Acceptance of Minutes from Last Call --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The attending TC members unanimously accepted the minutes from the last coordination call Chris had problems with the US toll-free dial-in number. If anyone else is experiencing problems with the telecon system, please report these to the mailing list. Action Items --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Michael: prepare issue tracking - in progress Michael: prepare roadmap - done, see discussion SC Status --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Accessibility (Michael) F2F meeting week of May 21 there is a proposal for description/titles on drawing objects, comments will be addressed at F2F ongoing discussion on tables in presentations (Florian) currently two options are evaluated: a) include tables directly in presentation schema b) use embedded spreadsheet tables (Yue Ma) what about storing table data for group of shapes elsewere (Florian) also consiidered, but design has problems continue discussion on tables via mailing list... Metadata (Patrick) currently writing draft for use-case document not yet as official result, but for getting comments hope to have it available before next monday's call Formulas (David W) Syntax document done, no implementation yet next step is types then functions TC Discussion --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ISO ballot (Patrick) passed with no negative votes. Not sure yet, whether there will be a ballot resolution meeting. We need to work out how to address the comments Right now I am working on getting more detailed information from the national bodies that had comments attached to their vote... We should start on getting answers for comments (e.g. BiDi) (Michael) we should have a coordination call next week too, in order to decide on comments. Try to address comments on the ML until then, it looks like all they need is already in OpenDocument/Unicode. Will clarify ACTION: Michael to work on BiDi comments Roadmap (michael) anyone disagreeing to the proposal on the ML? (patrick) question: if we can solve all of the erratas for iso we should get that sooner (michael) errata comments from iso go into errata document once that doc is completed, an additional speciification eg 1.0.1 is created with those errata (patrick) what I am proposing is, the document that we are giving to iso has to say how the comments were resolved. this is than published as the iso version since A11Y came up in a comment, this should maybe be dealt with. what I am leaning to is, that we should have a version which is an OASIS specifcation as well as an ISO specification, so that the two are in sync. not sure whether we will get the oasis 15 day rule on A11Y (michael) would like to keep A11Y and errata seperate (lars) there is A11Y in comments, what role do we play in ballot resolutionopinion for comments? (patrickj) oasis will look at TC for answers on comments we should wait until we know more about the status of A11Y we may have to revisit the revision numbering (michael) we should now process comments we received we should deciide on how to proceed, when our responses are clear (lars) there should be one version, that is in sync at ISO and OASIS (michael) any objections to the roadmap proposal? - no objections - face 2 face june/july (michael) topics would be A11Y changes not clear whether F2F is required I do not expect that a F2F is necessary for those not sure about ISO comments (need to discuss those at F2F) (patrick) we probably need to wait until end of may we likely have more material when input from formula and metadata SC output is available (michael) proposal would be to decide end of may on whether a summer f2f is needed schedule for end of july, but expect it not to happen final decision end of may - no objections - New Action Items --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Michael to work on BiDi comments Next conference call --------------------------------------------------------------------------- coordination call: 2006-05-15, 3:00PM-4:00PM UTC
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]