[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [office] OpenDocument TC Coordination Call Minutes 2006-06-19
Attendees --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Voting Members: Robert Weir, IBM Patrick Durusau, Individual Waldo Bastian, Intel James Mason, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC34 David Faure, KDE Michael Brauer, Sun Microsystems Bruce D'Arcus, The OpenDocument Foundation Gary Edwards, The OpenDocument Foundation Florian Reuter, The OpenDocument Foundation Members: Lars Oppermann, Sun Microsystems Observers: Paul Langile, Corel Corp. Acceptance of Minutes from Previous Meeting ------------------------------------------- The attending TC members unanimously accepted the minutes from the last coordination call. Action Items ------------ Michael: prepare issue tracking - in progress Michael to prepare comments document - done Peter to clarify whether soft line breaks are a A11Y requirement - done, not a requirement now Lars to create proposal for soft page breaks - done Lars to provide Peter with link to the BiDi appendix -done --------------------------------------------------------------------- General: (Michael) I will be on vacation next Monday, Lars will chair meeting and do any spec editing that might become necessary ISO: (Patrick) the Chinese comments have gotten official status and can be addressed like the other ISO comments (Michael) I will include our answers in the comments document (Rob) can we get more info on some of the comments (James) likley that this is not possible through SC34, not much contact with Chinese body. The TC can respond anyway, noting that the TC might have further responses should more information become available at some time in the future (Michael) can we vote on responses now, given that the answers to the Chinese comments that we already have are included and the language that James suggested is included? [no objection] RESOLUTION: submit responses to ISO comments OpenDocument 1.1 Proposals: (Michael) Schedule for 1.1: - we want to have 1.1 as an OASIS Standard this year, so that voting does not take place in the holiday season - we must have a committee draft ready no later than July 24th but to leave some more room we should finish July 17th - we thus can accept substantial proposals only until this Friday (June 23rd) (Lars) is anyone working on yet unknown proposals? [no answer] (Michael) we can accept minor/editorial proposals until July 13th. (Michael) is anyone disagreeing to this schedule [no objection] RESOLUTION: go with 1.1 schedule described by Michael A11Y - soft page-breaks (Lars) I have got some comments on my proposal and will post a revised version. There is a clarification needed o n what applications generate soft page breaks and an addition, that an application that can generate the pagination information should allow the user to have the information included in the saved file. I'd like to vote us on the proposal under the condition that the revisions I just stated are included. [no objection] RESOLUTION: include revised soft page-break proposal ACTION: Lars, post revised proposal Captions (Bruce) we discussed this on the list... there remains the question whether a caption is referenced with an attribute named 'described-by' or one called 'caption-id (Lars) Given the ongoing metadata efforts, 'described-by' seams to broad in meaning, and we should go with caption-id, since what is referenced is clearly only a caption in this case [no objection] (Michael) lets vote on the whole batch of A11Y proposal now, given the modification we just agreed to are done [no objection] RESOLUTION: include A11Y proposals, captions referenced by caption-id (Michael) there is still no wording for the table in presentation issue, so that might get moved to 1.2 (Michael) lets now vote on the other 1.1 proposals that we have or discuss any issues should there be any left with them... Proposals for UK and JP ISO comments that could not go into 1.0.1 [no objection] BiDi Appendix (non normative) [no objection] RESOLUTION: include BiDi Appendix Schema spelling errors (Michael) should we include mechanisms that allow backwards interoperability for the misspelled schema (James) Process for this in ISO allows editors to just correct this (Lars) we should do likewise [no objections] (Michael) can we proceed likewise for any other schema spelling issues that come up? [no objections] RESOLUTION: Correction of schema spelling error is part of editorial process writing-mode (bidi) attribute for graphic styles [no objections] RESOLUTION: add a writing-mode attribute to graphic styles show-ending-page (presentations) (David F.) This would be an attribute for presentations, that specifies, whether a special ending-page should be shown by the applications at the end of a presentation [no objections] RESOLUTION: include David's ending-page proposal in 1.1 New Action Items ---------------- Michael: editing of 1.1 draft according to resolutions Lars: post revised soft-page-break proposal Next conference call -------------------- coordination call: 2006-06-26, 3:00PM-4:00PM UTC
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]